And now we come to it. On Sunday March 21, 2010 the
Senate Healthcare bill HR3200 was passed and signed into law the
following Tuesday. Like I said before, there are a legion of horrible
and just plain evil aspects to this bill and I’m sure you’ve heard a lot
them by now. I don’t want to discount them but what cannot be missed
here is this new law now opens a prophetic door on a magnitude not seen
since the reformation of Israel.
This new law requires an RFID chip implanted in all of
us. This chip will not only contain your personal information with
tracking capability but it will also be linked to your bank account. And
get this, Page 1004 of the new law (dictating the timing of this chip),
reads, and I quote: "Not later than 36 months after the date of the enactment". It is now the law of the land that by March 23rd
2013 we will all be required to have an RFID chip underneath our skin
and this chip will be link to our bank accounts as well as have our
personal records and tracking capability built into it.
In just a minute I’m going to show you the black and
white of the law itself and you can see it with your own eyes and wonder
why an event of this magnitude which is nothing less than seismic in
nature is met with little more than silence in the Christian community.
Is it now starting to dawn on you just where exactly
we are in prophecy? I’ll ask that question again in a minute and follow
up on it, but now I want to show you the law itself. I’ve downloaded a
PDF copy of HR3200 from the government's website so what I’m about to
show you is from the bill itself its nothing that I’ve written. You can
access it all and see it all for yourself straight from the source
itself.
H.R. 3200 section 2521, Pg. 1001, paragraph 1.
The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘and is— ‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.”
The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘and is— ‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.”
What exactly is a class II device that is implantable? As you saw earlier, it is the device approved by the FDA in 2004.
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act:http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuid...
A class II implantable device is an "implantable radio frequency transponder system for patient identification and health information." The purpose of a class II device is to collect data in medical patients such as "claims
data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for
the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments,
electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the
Secretary."
Going back to what we just looked at, the creation of the national medical device registry in section 2521, page 1002 line 5:
“In developing the registry, the secretary shall…”
And the law continues on with a laundry list of items
that the secretary must do in the process of creating this registry. In
this laundry list of items to do, Line 17, subparagraph B: "validating methods for analyzing patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources and for linking such data with the information included in the registry as described in subparagraph (A)"
Going back to subparagraph A [right above subparagraph B], it says: “including
in the registry, in a manner consistent with subsection (f),
appropriate information to identify each device described in paragraph
(1) by type, model, and serial number or other unique identifier;”
Don’t be confused by the intentional obfuscation and
skillful wording, This law first creates the national device registry
and then immediately list all the task the secretary of health and human
services will have do in the process of creating this registry.
The very first two items in the list mandates that the
secretary first gives a unique identification to each of the items
listed in paragraph 1 which is:
‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable.”
Then, the very next thing the secretary is to do is to create the process by which “patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources”,
which is electronic medical records, that are linked to these newly and
uniquely identified items from paragraph 1 which are the class III and
class II implantable devices.
Class III devises are items such as breast implants,
pacemakers, heart valves, etc. A Class II device that is implantable is,
as you seen from the FDA, an implantable radio frequency transponder,
RFID chip. From breast implants, to pacemakers, to RFID chips which one
is the only possible one that can used for the stated purpose in section
B which is, “for linking such data with the information included in the registry”?
As we know from subsection A, the information in the registry is the
name of a device. In plain speak, we are in a clear way being told that
our electronic medical records are going to be linked to a class II
implantable device!
Continuing a few lines down in this same section, section B subsection ii on still on page 1002, the “patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources”, that is to be linked is clearly spelled out as electronic medical records. It reads: “link data obtained under clause (i) with information in the registry”.
Information in the registry is, as we know from subparagraph A, the
name of the device. So what is the data obtained under clause i? Back up
a few lines to clause i
It reads: “obtain access to disparate sources of patient safety and outcomes data, including Federal health-related electronic data”.
Again, from breast implants, to pacemakers, to RFID chips which one is
the only possible one that can used for the stated purpose in section B?
That stated purpose is “for linking such data” and the such data is electronic medical records.
What we already have already seen in just the creation
of this registry, is the device that will serve as the link, which is
an RFID microchip that is categorized as a Class II implantable device,
as well as what it will be the link for which is your electronic medical
records.
In case the law wasn’t clear enough on that point,
still in the laundry list of things to do a few more lines down on the
next page, page 1005
“The Secretary to protect the public health; shall
establish procedures to permit linkage of information submitted pursuant
to subparagraph (A, remember subparagraph A is the class 2 implantable
device reference) with patient safety and outcomes data obtained under
paragraph (3, which is electronic medical records); and to permit
analyses of linked data;”
Continuing on to page 1007, in the STANDARDS,
IMPLEMENTATION CRITERIA, AND CERTIFICATION CRITERIA section, the
secretary of health and human services is given full power to intact all
mandates from the laundry list of to-do items in the creation process
of the registry as well as dictate how the devises listed in the
National Medical Device Registry are to be used and implemented.
"The Secretary of the Health Human Services, acting
through the head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health
Information Technology, shall adopt standards, implementation
specifications, and certification criteria for the electronic exchange
and use in certified electronic health records of a unique device
identifier for each device described in paragraph 1 (National Medical
Device Registry), if such an identifier is required by section 519(f) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360i(f)) for the
device."
Now on Page 503, section E Lines 13-17 and I quote: "encourage,
as appropriate, the development and use of clinical registries and the
development of clinical effectiveness research data networks from
electronic health records, post marketing drug and medical device surveillance efforts". Let me say that again, medical device surveillance efforts!
Now lets look at section 163 of HR3200, which gives
the government a direct electronic access to your bank account which
will work in conjunction with an implanted chip.
Page 58 Lines 5 through 15 reads:
(D) enable the real-time (or near real time) determination of an individual’s financial responsibility at the point of service and, to the extent possible, prior to service, including whether the individual is eligible for a specific service with a specific physician at a specific facility, which may include utilization of a machine-readable health plan beneficiary identity detection card; (E) enable, where feasible, near real-time adjudication of claims
(D) enable the real-time (or near real time) determination of an individual’s financial responsibility at the point of service and, to the extent possible, prior to service, including whether the individual is eligible for a specific service with a specific physician at a specific facility, which may include utilization of a machine-readable health plan beneficiary identity detection card; (E) enable, where feasible, near real-time adjudication of claims
What does this mean? It means that the government will
give everybody a health ID card that contains a machine readable device
(magnetic strip or RFID chip) similar to a credit card. Embedded in
this chip or strip is your Health Identification Number. When you visit a
medical provider, the medical claims will be processed while you are
still in the office. The medical providers will be paid in real time.
The portion that you owe will be deducted from your bank account, in
real time, according to HR 3200.
Notice here in this part which is at the beginning of 2000 plus pages of the law, it is carefully worded “which may include utilization of a machine-readable health plan beneficiary identity detection card”. Here we are told that it may be a card. As you have already seen, deeper in the law [Sec. 2521 Pg. 1000] what this “may” utilize is clearly spelled out as a “class II device that is implantable”.
We can only speculate at this point why the law is set
up this way. Most likely this section was written to account for the
gap in time from when the process of chipping begins to when everyone
has received a chip. A means of starting with a card for the sake of
expedience while the process of chipping citizenry plays out. One thing
is certain, the law mandates that within 3 years we will all have a chip
under our skin that will serve this purpose.
Evidence of this logic is found in the deadline set for the start of the registry on page 1006.
"EFFECTIVE DATE.—The Secretary of Health and Human
Services shall establish and begin implementation of the registry under
section 519(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by
paragraph (1), by not later than the date that is 36 months after the
date of the enactment of this Act, without regard to whether or not
final regulations to establish and operate the registry have been
promulgated by such date."
Also on page 259, this law requires the use of
Electronic medical records system in all hospitals by 2012 which will
leave a gap of at least a year before the class II implantable device is
required.
Republican Congressman Ron Paul from Texas, states on his website:
"Buried deep within the over 1,000 pages of the
massive US Health Care Bill (PDF) in a “non-discussed” section titled:
Subtitle C-11 Sec. 2521— National Medical Device Registry, and which
states its purpose as........ He quotes that part of the law and then
goes on to say: "In “real world speak”, according to this report, this
new law, when fully implemented, provides the framework for making the
United States the first Nation in the World to require each and every
one of its citizens to have implanted in them a radio-frequency
identification microchip for the purpose of controlling who is, or
isn’t, allowed medical care in their country".
That is from a currently serving member of congress.
Cutting through all the political ease, the bottom line is that
eventually if you want to participate in a government healthcare plan
you will have to have this chip implanted in you. This law mandates that
you have to have insurance and by virtue of this law guarantees that
all private healthcare insurers will be driven out of business with only
the government option left. We will be in a single payer system and you
will have to have an imbedded chip to be a member of this system and it
is mandatory that you be a part of this system
No comments:
Post a Comment